![Korea IT Times](/img/default-banner.jpg)
- 50
- 23 644
Korea IT Times
Canada
Registrace 15. 11. 2021
From Reactive to Proactive: OFIL Develops Gridnostic with Predictive Analytics for Grid Resilience
From Reactive to Proactive: OFIL Develops Gridnostic with Predictive Analytics for Grid Resilience
zhlédnutí: 4
Video
[No.031] Technics and Civilization: AI Today: Navigating Rapid Advancements and Ethical Challenges
zhlédnutí 18Před 19 hodinami
Layne Hartsell interviews computer scientist Oliver Sampson
[No. 030] Technics and Civilization: Peace In The World Of Disparity by Dr Layne Hartsell
zhlédnutí 10Před měsícem
In a series of remarks on civilization, eco-societies, and peace delivered in Bangkok in June 2024, Dr. Layne Hartsell proposed a concept of peace in a world of disparity.
[No. 029] Technics and Civilization: 500 Years of Debt, Philosophical and Journalistic Perspectives
zhlédnutí 335Před 2 měsíci
Layne Hartsell interviews Asia Times correspondent Jan Krikke
[No. 028] Technics and Civilization: The Land is Everything
zhlédnutí 473Před 2 měsíci
Layne Hartsell interviews American poet-ecophilosopher Derrick Jensen
From Oil Executive to Peace Advocate: Mandar Apte's Journey to Non-Violence
zhlédnutí 28Před 3 měsíci
Current Affairs: Cities for Peace. Layne Hartsell in dialogue with Mandar Apte of Cities for Peace
[No. 027] Technics and Civilization: Dr. Layne Hartsell's lecture: Reorientation and Innovation
zhlédnutí 70Před 4 měsíci
2024 Asia Pacific Consortium of Researchers and Educators, Integrative Solutions for the Future of Asia: Catalyzing Graduate Research for Sustainable Development In a thought-provoking lecture titled "Reorientation, Research, and Innovation," Layne Hartsell delivered a compelling narrative that bridges ancient wisdom with contemporary ecological challenges. Drawing from diverse sources ranging ...
[No. 026] Technics and Civilization: State of P2P: Progress, Challenges, and Hope
zhlédnutí 77Před 5 měsíci
Dr. Layne Hartsell in dialogue with P2P theorist Michel Bauwens
2024 세계인공지능학회에서 '혁신적 AI 응용상' 수상한 하렉스인포텍 연구
zhlédnutí 32Před 5 měsíci
[밴쿠버] 세계인공지능학회(AAAI-24) 개막 총회가 20일 밴쿠버 컨벤션센터에서 열렸다. 이번 학회에서 한국의 하렉스인포텍과 경희대 이경전 교수 연구팀이 혁신적 인공지능 응용상을 수상했다. 하렉스인포텍의 GCI(General Commerce Intelligence)엔진은 소비자와 판매자의 데이터를 보호하면서도 고품질의 AI 서비스를 제공하는 차별화된 기술이다. 이번에 수여된 상의 특징은 이경전 교수팀의 GCI엔진을 포함해 실제 사용자에게 측정 가능한 이점을 제공하는 전세계 14개의 인공지능 응용 시스템에 수여되었다.
[No.003] Current Affairs: Pakistan: Yesterday, Today and the Future
zhlédnutí 144Před 5 měsíci
Dr. Layne Hartsell in dialogue with geopolitical analyst Malik Ayub Sumbal
[No.025] Technics and Civilization: Emerging Technology and Ecology: A Crossroads for Humanity
zhlédnutí 58Před 6 měsíci
Lecture by Dr. Layne Hartsell for the 14th Annual Social Ethics Conference, Manilla/Davao Tag 2024- Emerging Technology and Ecology Modern emerging technologies could be seen as drawing on the foundationalAsilomar Conference on biotechnology held in February 1975 at Pacific Grove in Monterrey, California. At the Conference, more than 140 experts ranging from biologists to physicians to legal ex...
[No.024]Technics and Civilization: White Gold Rush: Lithium
zhlédnutí 57Před 7 měsíci
Dr. Layne Hartsell interviews author Max Wilbert
[No.001] Current Affairs: Feminism and Gender
zhlédnutí 191Před 7 měsíci
Dr. Layne Hartsell in dialogue with Lierre Keith and Melinda Hughes
[No.023]Technics and Civilization: Forests: A Deep Green Voice from Colorado
zhlédnutí 54Před 8 měsíci
Dr. Layne Hartsell interviews Deanna Meyer
[No. 022] Technics and Civilization: Rivers Married to Mountains, The Poetics of Rivers
zhlédnutí 339Před 9 měsíci
Dr. Layne Hartsell in dialogue with ecophilosopher Derrick Jensen
[No. 021] Technics and Civilization: AI and Feminism
zhlédnutí 26Před 10 měsíci
[No. 021] Technics and Civilization: AI and Feminism
[No. 020] Technics and Civilization: Algorithms and Deplatforming
zhlédnutí 26Před 11 měsíci
[No. 020] Technics and Civilization: Algorithms and Deplatforming
[No. 019] Technics and Civilization: Lithium and Society: The Great Mineral Rush
zhlédnutí 51Před rokem
[No. 019] Technics and Civilization: Lithium and Society: The Great Mineral Rush
[No. 018] Technics and Civilization: Money and a Multipolar World: India and China
zhlédnutí 21Před rokem
[No. 018] Technics and Civilization: Money and a Multipolar World: India and China
[No. 05] Korea's Traditional Sword Danceㅡ"Gyeok Vigor"
zhlédnutí 17KPřed rokem
[No. 05] Korea's Traditional Sword Danceㅡ"Gyeok Vigor"
[No. 04] Tae Pyeong Seong Dae Age of Prosperous Tranquility
zhlédnutí 113Před rokem
[No. 04] Tae Pyeong Seong Dae Age of Prosperous Tranquility
[No. 03] Landscape of Korean Traditional Arts - Pungnyu Ga In ('Jang-gu' Jubilee)
zhlédnutí 429Před rokem
[No. 03] Landscape of Korean Traditional Arts - Pungnyu Ga In ('Jang-gu' Jubilee)
[No. 02] Landscape of Korean Traditional Arts- Gyeol (Integrity)
zhlédnutí 64Před rokem
[No. 02] Landscape of Korean Traditional Arts- Gyeol (Integrity)
[No. 01] Landscape of Korean Traditional Arts- Buchae chum(Fan dance)
zhlédnutí 216Před rokem
[No. 01] Landscape of Korean Traditional Arts- Buchae chum(Fan dance)
[No. 017] Technics and Civilization: The Nordic Model with David Rovics
zhlédnutí 42Před rokem
[No. 017] Technics and Civilization: The Nordic Model with David Rovics
[No. 016] Technics and Civilization: Money, Debt, and Value
zhlédnutí 49Před rokem
[No. 016] Technics and Civilization: Money, Debt, and Value
A reflection on dependent origination from the cosmological argument and quantum physics
zhlédnutí 28Před rokem
A reflection on dependent origination from the cosmological argument and quantum physics
[No. 015] Technics and Civilization on Bioregionalism: Dr. Layne Hartsell's lecture
zhlédnutí 305Před rokem
[No. 015] Technics and Civilization on Bioregionalism: Dr. Layne Hartsell's lecture
[No. 014] Technics and Civilization: Crises - Biodiversity and Habitat Loss
zhlédnutí 40Před rokem
[No. 014] Technics and Civilization: Crises - Biodiversity and Habitat Loss
Technics and Civilization: Dr. Layne Hartsell discusses the war in Ukraine
zhlédnutí 41Před rokem
Technics and Civilization: Dr. Layne Hartsell discusses the war in Ukraine
Lierre could you make a video about how to empower women and faciliate women solidarity
uh uh uh uh uh um uh um uh uh uh uh uh um uh um uh uh uh uh uh um uh um uh uh uh uh uh um uh um uh uh uh uh uh um uh um uh uh uh uh uh um uh um uh uh uh uh uh um uh um uh uh uh uh uh um uh um uh uh uh uh uh um uh um uh uh uh uh uh um uh um uh uh uh uh uh um uh um uh uh uh uh uh um uh um
500Years of Debt by Jan Krikke: In a thought-provoking dialogue hosted by the Korea IT Times, philosopher Layne Hartsell and journalist Jan Krikke delved into the profound implications of the history and procession of debt spanning over five centuries. The discussion brought together diverse viewpoints on the socio-economic and moral dimensions of indebtedness that have shaped human societies globally. Jan Krikke, drawing from his extensive journalistic experience covering global economic trends, provided a pragmatic perspective on how debt has been utilized by governments, corporations, and individuals to drive progress and navigate crises and highlighted the dual nature of debt as both a tool for economic growth and a potential catalyst for instability when mismanaged or exploited such as when the US left the gold standard in 1971. The dialogue between Hartsell and Krikke underscored the procession of debt from ancient times to the present day, touching upon landmark events such as the emergence of modern banking systems, sovereign debt crises, and the global financial meltdown of 2008. Their exchange explored how debt has influenced geopolitical power dynamics, societal structures, and individual freedoms over centuries.Throughout the conversation, both speakers agreed on the complexity of debt as a subject that defies simple categorization or resolution. Hartsell’s philosophical inquiry complemented Krikke’s journalistic analysis, offering a comprehensive view that touched upon historical, ethical, and practical dimensions.The discussion echoed beyond the confines of academia and journalism, resonating with broader societal debates on economic justice, sustainability, and the responsibilities inherent in managing debt in the 21st century. [AI evaluation of the material]
Neo-malthusian idiocy; absolute crap. DJ is someone's tool LOL
Keep the blinders on, if that's what makes you happy.
@@DavidQuispeCampbell foundation funded genocidal ideology. thank you Langley/chatham house/tavistock for these clowns. laughter is always good.
Yeah dont dorry, civilization and humanity will survive forever
Land is everything. All species including human benefit best to make planet health a priority above all else. Humans idea of owning life, turning the planet into private property, has to be the fundamental wrong of culture maybe. Private property in all ways serves powerful private interests/laws/contracts/practices keeps all human in line as those with power/money continues destruction of all of life's entire planet. This makes humans the monster destroyer of all life, including of their own species. Life seems past a point of flourish in any mass area on the planet but, maybe not pass point of returning to a flourish. Derrick my mom use to tell me, "be observant" over and over to imprint it's importance. So crow was good lesson and thanks for passing it on. Reminded me of my mom. Thank you for this Layne, and for this chance to hear Derrick. He is a like a slow bleed in a good way. Even just 10 minutes of attention span on anything he says will plant a seed. Thank you to you both.
Derrick Jensen’s work and activism challenge conventional thinking by emphasizing the profound yet straightforward concept that "The Land is Everything." He critiques Western society for its emphasis on progress, consumption, and dominion over nature, arguing that this has led to a fundamental disconnect from the land. Jensen views the land as a living entity, essential for meaningful existence. He highlights that this estrangement results in environmental devastation, ecosystem degradation, and species extinction, extending its impact to social and psychological realms, fostering violence, despair, and meaninglessness. Jensen aligns with thinkers like Mencius and Tertullian, advocating for a Deep Green approach that emphasizes a renewed, respectful relationship with the land based on interconnectedness and reciprocity. www.koreaittimes.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=132253
What a great surprise to find this conversation with Lierre and Melinda. Thank you for this. I'm a supporting member of WoLF and care very deeply about all the issues discussed.
Wow. This is what K-pop should be. What an amazing dance
You haven't set up your CZcams video SEO and rank #Tag(Keyword) properly due to which your correct audience is not watching your videos and your views are not increasing.
info
Good interview. You got him to cover some new material
I was aware that not all EV cars were covered in the Inflation Reduction Act, but I hadn't fully processed that as about China. It is interesting that they are looking at other rare earth minerals to patent for batteries too. It isn't surprising, but it is still disgusting that Europe is back to colonialist tricks and using its power to set up trade agreements that hurt countries that have resources that wealthier countries want. How can we solve any of this until we get away from capitalism?
About knowledge and whether people know more today than they did 1000 years ago (or whenever), I think the average "amount of knowledge" per person is not very different, but I think we as a community have vastly more knowledge today. The way this can be true is that, if you pick two people at random from the global community today, you would expect there to be less knowledge overlap between them than there would be if we picked two people at random 1000 years ago. At that time, most people (especially within a smaller community) could be expected to know very similar things and not much besides that, but today people are more specialized in a larger variety of fields. To put it another way: If today you pick a 30 year old farmer in Indonesia and a 30 year old venture capitalist in Sweden, you would expect _far_ less overlap in knowledge between them than you would between any two 30 year olds alive 1000 years ago. So while the "amount of knowledge per individual" is not very different in the two cases, the _combined_ knowledge of the farmer and the venture capitalist is much larger than the _combined_ knowledge of the other two. This is presumably one way in which communities get both more powerful and more fragmented in modernity-because there is less knowledge overlap between its members, but their combined capacities keep expanding.
Really well done Deanna
Thanks!😊
Tim Garret a Physicist has 6 peer reviewed papers proving that civilization is an Heat engine, no matter how it is powered. Green capitalism or renewables actually hasten our collective entropy. We’re Done:(
Hi , can someone tell me the work that Lierre mentions at around 20:55 just after she tears up? she says "and maybe i read xxxxx too many times as a child ...." curios about it, because if it shaped her as a child , i would want others to read it too thanks
I think most people believe real ecological progress to be “utopian”…..but we have the Amish communities and the like to show us a way forward. We don’t necessarily have to adopt the religious/spirituality of Amish folks, for instance, but we could analyze technology like they do. They are not necessarily against new technologies, they just council with each other about the merits of each new technology up for debate. It seems very purposeful, yet organic/natural.
Succinct comment! I agree with the low tech Amish part. Americans will never voluntarily change to live more sane and sustainably, we were given the industrial capitalist crack pipe and we’re gonna smoke until the end because we chose to have drug dealers rather than flourishing biotic communities, not our fault tho, we were born into captivity.
@@levijames96 yep, born cattle. Lol
I personally think it’s impossible to adopt any set of beliefs while rejecting the foundation of those beliefs. They will eventually fall away when challenged.
brilliant discussion too bad it always leads back to extinction.
The Republic of Information! Great image. Participatory global commons. Great!
I do have solutions
iT appears that you do not comprehend the true nature of the United Nations. Look into their peace keeping forces, accused of thousands of cases of rape, there was investigations, and no prosecutions, no accountability. IN addition, their role in the great reset and in agenda 21 and agenda 2030- they are an instrument intended to have purpose towards the new world order, a fascist totalitarian police state of 500 milion survivors planned. This kind of ignorance is not conducive to real leadership. Mistakes to be made are very important. You also don't seem to have a grasp on the depth of evil that we face, and its deliberate subversion using the media
One of the major topics today, and social concerns, is technological determinism and its effects on societies and individuals. In this discussion, Ryan Maboloc responds with his ideas on current topics in the philosophy of technology and how we are affected by rapid technological changes, particularly digital systems that we use in smartphones and social media. Questions include “What is the contextualization of technology?” and what is meant by “People-centered technology?” www.koreaittimes.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=114497
I would recommend to the host to use a simple lavalier microphone. They are cheap - like $15 - on eBay. Otherwise your audio is muddy and echoey.
Questions Layne: [I will give a description of Half-Earth and ask for an initial response.] E.O. Wilson writes, “we thrash about, appallingly led, with no particular goal in mind other than economic growth, unfettered consumption, good health, and personal happiness. The impact on the rest of the biosphere is everywhere negative, the environment becoming unstable and less pleasant, our long-term future less certain” That’s an accurate view, except the “we” is about 5-8% of people and all led by industrial capitalism; the advanced technical societies are small compared to the rest of the human and animal population, yet create tremendous havoc. [I can leave this for you to say] Then, Wilson goes on to offer a solution or Half-Earth, which is to move the Earth’s population of human beings to urban centers and let nature restore the planet. One of the great science fiction writers, Kim Stanley Robinson, wrote in an op-ed piece “People tend to like cities, and have been congregating in them ever since the invention of agriculture, 10,000 or so years ago. That’s why we call it civilization.” He goes on, “Cities emerge from the confusion of possibilities as beacons of hope…If we managed urbanization properly, we could nearly remove ourselves from a considerable percentage of the planet’s surface. That would be good for many of the threatened species we share this planet with, which in turn would be good for us because we are completely enmeshed in Earth’s web of life.” Stanley says we ought to do this because “people are leaving the land and moving to cities anyway.” Your initial response to this “emergency response? Continuing story: www.koreaittimes.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=113986
I like Derrick a lot, but I think it's a tactical error to attack "industrial capitalism" when it's "industrial civilization," or simply "civilization" that's the problem. Derrick even gives the example of his socialist acquaintance who displacing indigenous people to build a bus. One reason I say this, besides thinking it's true, is that when I talk about civilization being unsustainable to my rightist friends, they are open to it, it makes intuitive sense when pointed out to them. But if I were to criticise the capitalistic aspect of it, it immediately raises their guard, and DERAILS the conversation into one of rightism vs leftism. Otherwise great talk!
Whilst I somewhat agree with your point, I have a problem with the reasoning you gave. I, too, often find myself wondering if i should be attacking civilization itself, or perhaps agriculture or industrialism etc. It's important to remember that they are all connected, and I think it's important to attack the root of the problem else others will continue to arise. On other hand, I believe your conservative friends are just being placidly agreeable on a topic they know little about. I'd imagine they routinely throw around pro-capitalist talking points spouted off by conservative talking heads, but have very little to say in defense of civilization. But believe me, if anti-civ ideologies ever become common place, you can be sure that Fox News and all the rest will try their level best to make sure they don't spread, by which I mean indoctrinating their base with a new set of nonsensical pro-civ talking points. I can't imagine the mental gymnastics your friends must go through to agree with you that civilization is unsustainable, and simultaneously defend the most unsustainable economic system that has ever existed on this planet. For me personally, it was much easier to come to the conclusion that capitalism was unsustainable than it was to come to the conclusion that civilization itself was unsustainable. I don't believe its enough to simply get people to agree that civilization is unsustainable. We must strive to fundamentally change the way people view the world around them.
@@Straitac12 I think my conservative friends would be a lot more open to the ideas of civilization collapse were not so obviously attached to the scapegoating of capitalism, while at the same time Marxist smuggling. Anyway, I notice my liberal friends near equally as good a gymnasts. Anyway, I'm guessing you're just leftist. You think communist civilization is sustainable? Really?
@@chadreilly My mistake if I said something to give the impression that I am a communist/leftist, because I am certainly neither of those things. I also am not in favor of civilization and consider myself a huge fan of Jensen's work. I feel I was misconstrued so let me try again. My only point was that if civilization is unsustainable, (which I believe it is) then certainly capitalism is also unsustainable, and it's important for people to be able to understand the reasons why. The reason I decided to comment on your post in the first place is because I have a friend I speak to regularly about these ideas who I'd imagined to be similar to your rightist friends. He is sometimes willing to concede that civilizations current trajectory is on a path toward destruction, but convincing him that it is civilization itself that must be stopped (instead of corporate greed or human selfishness or whatnot) is nearly impossible.
@@Straitac12 OK, which I would agree with. But if it's civilization that's unsustainable, there is no point in heaping the sins upon capitalism, whereas communist civilization commits the same sins, though perhaps not as efficiently. Whereas when you whip capitalism you "sound" communist/socialist, which is repulsive to individualists. Having been around this issue for only a short while it seem fairly evident that most of the people who are "sounding" communist, in fact "are" communist. Making the right's feelings of repulsion, not entirely misplaced. At this point I wonder if civilization must, or even can, be stopped. I think it's a good idea ramp down, but too late to ramp down, and it's going to crash under its own weight, very quickly. Whereas convincing people to do anything is like taking a hand drill to the hull of the titanic, after it's struck the iceberg. Certainly we're beyond debating the merits of capitalism vs communism. Anyway, when I first read Jensen saying civilization is unsustainable, full stop, and here's why. I could not fault his reasoning, and now I think it seems obvious. You're friend might just not be that smart. He might lack the cognitive capacity or imagination to look at things from a different angle. Maybe his mother drank when she was carrying him, lol
There's a stigma for being a communist but being a capitalist is perfectly fine . Huh very interesting
“We reconsider who we are, and how we see ourselves and others” and “aims at creating an open educational platform with a participatory approach.” www.koreaittimes.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=111647
Hey! Great video. The number one spot for online marketing P R O M O S M!!
What is behind professor Keen that makes it look like he has a flapping wig on the back of his head?
I think it's headphones on his head.